Moved
That is substantial for a battery replacement.. did your battery die?
I think it’s a super fine studio production tool as well, it’s just missing a few sound design specific features that would make it a better all-in-one device in my opinion. I also think that, while desktop format is my preferred format, the whole micro sized devices trend is imposing unnecessary limitations. Not a fan of the airas, volcas, pocket operators, etc. The OP format can easily be doubled in depth size without reducing its portability and yet vastly increasing the functionality and workflow. So this XL concept is my idea of the XY perfected.
In my latest mockup, I included dedicated 3.5mm midi in and out AND dedicated 3.5mm cv in and out, AND dedicated 3.5mm audio send and return.
In case TE is on here, I’d have to add ‘‘like they dont know this’’ that the XY engine (once complete) in a EP format (maybe 2x the surface size) would rock the groovebox world!;
not just in ‘‘what an awesome/superior instrument’’ reaction but also in record sales 
I’m all for plastic & light-weight; if its sturdy & carries that Star Wars Skywalker look 
we dont really need the 133 umbrellas and crazy train of color chaos nor do we need the expensive XY LCD blinking and blowing kisses every time you do a jump effect … 
As long as it can display waveform and has dedicated focus on workflow (thinking grid like seq view: ala OXI One (whereas you can view step components per lane among many other views modes) and respectable real-time performance factor (dedicated disk for tape, dedicated volume pots for buses) etc etc we will all be superstars 
I’m certainly interested in what more the EP format has to offer.. I was under the impression that they would be like PO XLs, so hopefully they do come out with more. The medieval was a disappointment though, compared to 133 