Hey everyone. I’ve had my OP-1 unit for a while, but ever since whenever I encounter Dsynth\Dbox tools, i get extremly scared by them and all my tries to handle them made no use and I still struggle to understand them. I am somehow familiar with different synth methods, tweaked some of software and hardware stuff with some digestible results. But these are real challenge for me. Can anyone give tips or share their kits with explanation on how they’ve been done?
I couldn’t find them in the online manual. Common problem with both is that the controls abbreviate or obscure the actual parameter changes, Dsynth is a kind of FM, the pink waveform is the carrier, blue is Modulator (hence M by 2), 0-1 is the relative rate (frequency) of modulator (shift+blue), 1 (blue) seems to be an overly clever control of the balance between the two. Green/shift+green is self-explanatory, white/shift+white is the same kind of unfortunate envelope control - decay from short to long and past long it becomes attack; Orange (mode) seems to be a saturation of sorts and shift+orange is a some kind of pre-filter to the saturation effect. You get 24x slots of the same in DBox and you can lift/drop between them if you practice the voodoo first. In fact Dbox is interesting with that you can treat it as a synth, it would transpose ok, and you can program subtle changes for all keys. Good fun for sound design even though it sounds like 8-bit shit, and extremely frustrating if you know your way around oscillators, filters, envelopes. Give it more time and tries.
Good fun for sound design even though it sounds like 8-bit shit, and extremely frustrating if you know your way around oscillators, filters, envelopes. Give it more time and tries.
Yeah, i cant quite get it if these synths are more of a traditional way around or have some TE own flow, as with others. My impression is that they have a bit of both, but this makes them somehow confusing for me. And yeah, I’m still not sure if you can pump something more out of dbox than 8-bit glitches. It sounds like you can reilably variate on some 8-bit noizes, but creating some at least 808-ish sounds is quite hard. Well, i guess it at least suits my idm\cyberglitch needs, but I kind of treated dbox like Maschine’s drumsynth, maybe thats why they confuse me.
yeah… i get the confusion, but tbh, the disconnect from expected parameters and the standard signal flow is great imo.
dSynth is my favorite by far. I agree though - it has the narrowest sweetspots ever and one should’t apply existing knowledge of subtractive synthesis.
dSynth is my favorite by far. I agree though - it has the narrowest sweetspots ever and one should't apply existing knowledge of subtractive synthesis.dBox requires a lot of patience - but well worth it IMOhere's an example for a chromatically tuned dBox patch I made an entire age ago with a single pattern and live tweaks:https://soundcloud.com/tasmansea/tasmansea-op1-dboxonly-livejam
This is pretty nice stuff, right here. I’ve dicked around with DBox a bit but I kinda wanna save my energy for actually learning how to sequence drums properly with the “sane” kits.
@<a href=“https://www.operator-1.com/index.php?p=/profile/1886/Jellygeist” class=“Username” style=“margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 15px; font-family: “lucida grande”, “Lucida Sans Unicode”, tahoma, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(66, 157, 168); line-height: 22.1px; background-color: rgb(252, 252, 255);”>Jellygeist - thanks!.. pretty much every tune on my soundcloud involves dSynth in one way or the other. ‘munich’ is dSynth only with an added field recording
Nice track indeed!
dSynth is my favorite by far. I agree though - it has the narrowest sweetspots ever and one should't apply existing knowledge of subtractive synthesis.dBox requires a lot of patience - but well worth it IMOhere's an example for a chromatically tuned dBox patch I made an entire age ago with a single pattern and live tweaks:https://soundcloud.com/tasmansea/tasmansea-op1-dboxonly-livejam
For some reason it sounds like “if moog was digital” to me, i.e. quite nice. Good track. I think i expected dsynth to be more smooth, but it is quite gritty sounding.
Yes, I too have found that while tweaking some parameters in Dbox/Dsynth, the sound can change dramatically even with just a tiny knob twist.
I wish there was more than one slot for DSynth in the synth preset browser. All the other synth engines get a fair number of slots. Same with DBox on the drum side.
You might want to take a look at the beta. It has a bunch of DSynth and DNA presets and they are mighty fine.
I’ll wait for the official release, thanks, lol
I’ll wait for the official release, thanks, lol
Worth the wait then
here another dsynth track. it’s the only sound source ran through a bunch of sequenced filters
here another dsynth track. it's the only sound source ran through a bunch of sequenced filtershttps://soundcloud.com/tasmansea/lidded
This is exceptional work
This is exceptional work
thanks so much for the kind comment. and for listening of course… still contemplating if I should re-install the bass voice I had designed for it - but it got kinda busy the way it is I guess
This is exceptional work
thanks so much for the kind comment. and for listening of course… still contemplating if I should re-install the bass voice I had designed for it - but it got kinda busy the way it is I guess
There is always the temptation to add more, to keep tweaking until every perceived flaw is ironed out.
dSynth is my favorite by far. I agree though - it has the narrowest sweetspots ever and one should't apply existing knowledge of subtractive synthesis.dBox requires a lot of patience - but well worth it IMOhere's an example for a chromatically tuned dBox patch I made an entire age ago with a single pattern and live tweaks:https://soundcloud.com/tasmansea/tasmansea-op1-dboxonly-livejam
tasmansea, I just registered on this forum just to comment on your track.
So I guess the way to have more than one DBox preset in the preset selector is to mess with the OP-1 file structure using a computer. At least that’s what this part of the online guide seems to imply.
@<a href=“https://www.operator-1.com/index.php?p=/profile/2572/PeteFizz” class=“Username” style=“margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 15px; font-family: “lucida grande”, “Lucida Sans Unicode”, tahoma, sans-serif; vertical-align: baseline; text-decoration: none; color: rgb(66, 157, 168); background-color: rgb(252, 252, 255);”>PeteFizz hey bud, huuuge compliment. thanks so much for taking the time and writing this down. very flattered and happy indeed you can connect to this. <span style=“color: rgb(37, 38, 30); font-family: “lucida grande”, “Lucida Sans Unicode”, tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(252, 252, 255);”>Allesandro Cortini’s work is something I look up to for sure. He added the “like” to the track I’m most proud of certainly (flattered to death). It was part of a challenge on the old OP1 forum. rules were to only use dBox and any sequencer, no tape and only one pattern recorded straight to album (or so - pretty restricted anyway).